Sweeteners :: essays research papers fc

SweetenersSaccharin is an organic petroleum-based compound that is three to fivehundred times sweeter than sucrose. It is non-nutritive because the kindbody is unable to metabolize the foreign chemical. Saccharin does notcontribute calories for this cogitate it is commonly used in diet foods. "The obese feel that saccharin is their lifeline to slimdom, anddiabetics claim it is inwrought to control their blood sugar" (Brody482). The same sight who consume saccharin sure enough would not knowinglyeat something that is classified as toxic macerate however, they do it on adaily basis. Saccharins alias is EPA Hazardous go down on number U202. Infact, workers who handle saccharin are cautioned, "EXERCISE DUE CARE. lift CONTACT WITH EYES, SKIN, CLOTHING. WASH THOROUGHLY AFTER HANDLING. IF SWALLOWED, IF CONCIOUS, IMMEDIATELY INDUCE barf" (MSDS).Saccharin has always been surrounded by controversy. As early as 1907,the frequent was concerned over its safety and propo sed banning it. Theodore Roosevelt, a diabetic, fought the idea. He said, "My fixategives it to me every day...Anybody who says saccharin is injurious tohealth is an idiot"(Corcoran 12). Saccharin survived the onslaught foranother forty years. It wasnt until the bittersweet chemical hit themainstream consumer market in such things as diet sodas, pharmaceuticals,and chewing gum that it came under fire again. Scientists suggested thatsaccharin might be a carcinogen in 1951. In 1958, however, saccharin wasadded to the GRAS (Generally Recognized as Safe) list, another paradox. In 1972, the results of a long-term study showed that rats fed saccharinhad developed bladder tumors. Subsequently, the pabulum and DrugAdministration (FDA) removed saccharin from GRAS status and issued aregulation curb the use of saccharin in foods. Then in 1974, aNational honorary society of Science review found that, "Saccharin itself could notbe identified as the cause of the tumors because of p ossible impurities aswell as problems with experimental bod and procedures" (Kennedy 131). Therefore, the FDA decided not to ban saccharin until they received theresults of a study organism conducted in Canada.In March 1977, the Canadian study showed that feeding king-size doses ofsaccharin to pregnant rats and their weanlings produced bladder cancers inthe male offspring. The Canadians immediately banned saccharin. When theFDA denote its intentions to follow suit, public outcry led to aCongressionally voted eighteen-month moratorium. The American peoplewanted more time to evaluate the results of the study. Shortlythereafter, Congress enacted the Saccharin landing field and Labeling Act, whichstayed the FDAs hand temporarily and ordered a warning label on allsaccharin products "Use of this product may be hazardous to your health.