The Vinland Map :: History Papers

The Vinland typify is believed to predate Christopher Columbus expedition by almost 50 years as it has realistic cartography of the island of Vinland, panorama to be a part of Canada or correct Northeastern the States. The comprise could potentially provide evidence that the Norse explorers were the first Europeans to visit the States and map it. However, there is uncertainty surrounding the origins and age of the map. These issues have separate scientists into two groups devoted to proving the true(p)ity or lack thereof of the map. new research has used several chemical analyses which have examined specifically the make-up and the ink present on the map. The most recent methods used to try the map have been carbon geological dating and Raman spectroscopy. It is thought that the map was compose on paper which has origins in pre-Columbus days. However, several analyses of the ink have revealed the mien of anatase, a form of TiO 2, which was not developed until the first part of the 20 th Century. This clearly would contradict the evidence that the paper is authentic. However, these two claims do not necessarily contradict one another.A recent possible action is that the parchment was recovered from an earlier work and then a forger used modern ink to draw a fake map. Carbon-14 dating has put the origins of the parchment to the mid 1400s. It is very hard to come to a definitive conclusion from the available evidence as both sides passing strong arguments. In my own opinion, the map is more likely authentic than a forgery. However, the controversy surrounding the map has not yet been settled. The Vinland Map has been at the center of controversy ever since it appeared almost 1957. It depicts several islands in the Atlantic Ocean, but more importantly, an island called Vinland. This island is believed to be part of Canada or even Northeastern America. If the map is truly genuine, then it pre-dates Columbus discovery of America by more than 50 year s (Gorman, 2002). However, there has been constant doubt surrounding its origins and authenticity. These issues have divided scientists into two camps which seem to ride circles around one another. As soon as new evidence arises, someone disputes it with counterarguments that are just as strong. The controversy has focused most deep on two issues the ink used to draw the map, and the parchment that it is move upon.